![]() Atlanta · Cincinnati/Dayton · Dallas/Ft. Worth · Denver · Detroit · Houston · Kansas City · Los Angeles Milwaukee · Minneapolis/St. Paul · Oklahoma City · Phoenix · St.Louis · Tampa · Tulsa · Wichita |
|||||||||||||||||
|
Volume I, issue II Contact us: vitalsigns@vanguardenvl.com
|
American Business and Industry has been impacted with the critical challenge of satisfying an extensive scope of regulatory compliance requirements. Over 60 Environmental, Health and Safety (EHS) laws are now imposed upon Industry from the Federal Government (EPA, OSHA and DOT) with regulatory offshoots further mandated by state, county and local laws. It's no wonder people assigned to their company's regulatory compliance feel trapped in a regulatory maze. The problem is compounded by these regulations evolving at a rate of 30% per year, either through amendments or newly-enacted laws.
It is paramount that Industry approaches regulatory compliance with an emphasis on precision due diligence. Neglect, renders one's company vulnerable to massive enforcement penalties as high as $32,500 per day, per violation. Without performing proper due diligence, one could not hope to demonstrate compliance during an enforcement inspection. Defensible documentation reflective of one's due diligence is the one essential for standing the acid test of an inspection. [Incidentally, enforcement inspections by the U.S. EPA and OSHA are now occurring an average of every two minutes in America, not including DOT, or state, county and local agencies.]
PRECISION DUE DILIGENCE What benchmark do you use to test the strength of your regulatory compliance for over 60 laws imposed upon your company? What do you currently use as a basis for comparison? From a risk management perspective, your company’s future depends on the benchmark you’re using.
It has been Vanguard’s experience that most people in companies aren’t aware of all the laws, nor do they have a system or technology to determine which laws require compliance, as well as those that don’t. In short, people don’t understand what constitutes being in or out of compliance. Most often, the due diligence they execute is flawed, maybe even non-existent. It’s surprising just how many people claim their company is in compliance, but fail to utilize the correct measuring stick for assessing one’s compliance. Did you know there is a common thread running throughout regulatory compliance laws?
Virtually all the compliance laws (93% as a matter of fact!) are based on three elements:
The overwhelming majority of companies (large and small) are simply not equipped with the necessary expertise and/or technology to meet the insurmountable task of screening one's facility against the hundreds of thousands of regulated chemical hazards (among the four threshold categories), all for the purpose of implementing a compliance program to stand the acid test of an enforcement inspection. Further, it's too cost-prohibitive to assemble a representative staff with the time, versatility, expertise, experience, and technical writing skills to effectively and efficiently manage the daily challenges posed by compliance laws.
Essentially, there are 20 laws and regulations that almost any company in America must satisfy and manage. These requirements come into play by virtue of maintaining a chemical inventory as reflected in your MSDSs,
Law/Regulation…Regulated Chemical Hazards…Thresholds/Purpose
* Carcinogens cause cancer; mutagens cause genetic mutations; teratogens cause birth defects.
Beyond the 20 laws and regulations above, Industry is accountable for the determination on which of the following EPA, OSHA, DOT laws may requirement compliance activities in the form of permitting, reporting, documentation, employee training, and so on.
EPA: ENVIRONMENTAL DUE DILIGENCE
OSHA: SAFETY AND HEALTH DUE DILIGENCE
DOT, RSPA, HOMELAND SECURITY: HAZMAT & TERRORISM DUE DILIGENCE
END-RESULT: THE EHS MANAGER’S “COMPLIANCE PEACE OF MIND” The ultimate goal for precision due diligence effort is to illuminate the client’s site-specific Regulatory Compliance Agenda for each and every compliance year, as well as the legislative changes due to amended and newly-enacted laws. When considering the repercussions of enforcement penalties for not staying current with the evolution of regulatory law, the stakes are too high. Hence, the EHS Manager's mission must have a two-fold purpose: 1. To develop a site-specific Regulatory Compliance Agenda for his facility, relative to local, county, state, and Federal regulations; 2. To systematically satisfy the his facility’s compliance mandates on a Turn-Key basis, continuing to manage applicable regulatory issues over the years.
PRIMARY BENEFITS With the client's Regulatory Compliance Agenda as the ultimate arrival point, the vehicle for benchmarking compliance mandates far exceeds the traditional methods associated with conducting one compliance project at a time. Just as a trip to the moon would require a spaceship worthy of space travel, defining a client's site-specific Regulatory Compliance Agenda requires a unique technology with a comprehensive due diligence capability. When the proper due diligence has been executed and the pertinent compliance requirements satisfied relative to the results of that due diligence, the end-result benefits and outcomes include:
The agency believes that this waste can be better managed under EPA’s universal waste program. The universal waste rule is designed to reduce the amount of hazardous waste items in the municipal solid waste stream; encourage the recycling and proper disposal of some common hazardous wastes; and reduce the regulatory burden on businesses that generate these wastes. Although the handlers of universal wastes must meet less stringent standards for storing, transporting, and collecting wastes, the wastes must comply with full hazardous waste requirements for final recycling, treatment, or disposal. Many of these lamps are considered hazardous waste because they contain either mercury or lead solder.
Small Quantity Handlers (<5,000 kilograms of universal waste) and Large Quantity Handlers (>5,000 kilograms of universal waste) of universal waste must manage lamps in a way that prevents releases of any universal waste or component of a universal waste to the environment by containing any lamp in containers or packages that are structurally sound, adequate to prevent breakage, and compatible with the contents of the lamps and must immediately clean up and place in a container any lamp that is broken. A small or large quantity handler of universal waste must label or mark the universal waste.
The amount of mercury in a standard lamp can vary dramatically, from 3 to 46 mg. Mercury is a neurotoxin that negatively impacts humans and natural ecosystems. Exposure can result in damage to the central nervous system, kidneys, and liver. Mercury devices such as florescent lights actually reduce the amount of mercury in the environment. This because the energy they save allows a reduction in the burning of mercury emitting fuels by power plants. If the bulbs are disposed of properly, fluorescent lights are actually good for the environment.
If businesses take care to separate mercury from the waste stream the amount of mercury discharged into the environment could be reduced. Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators of universal waste should take advantage of available local recycling options for compact fluorescent light bulbs. Facilities should contact local municipal solid waste agencies or go to www.epa.gov/bulbrecycling or earth911.org to identify local recycling options.
In addition, Waste Management has recently acquired Lamp Tracker as a means of assisting facilities dispose of lamps properly. Facilities may purchase boxes from Waste Management which will be shipped directly to the facility, where they can store spent lamps and ship them back for proper disposal. Please visit www.wmlamptracker.com for more information. If facilities need assistance in locating a recycler they should contact Vanguard Environmental, Inc. for a recycler nearest to them.
On April 9, 2007, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) issued the Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards. Congress authorized the interim final rule under Section 550 of the DHS Appropriations Act of 2007. This directs DHS to identify, assess, and ensure effective security at high risk chemical facilities. A Chemical Facility is defined as “any establishment that possesses or plans to possess, at any relevant point in time, a quantity of a chemical substance determined by the Secretary (DHS) to be potentially dangerous or that meets other risk-related criteria identified by the Department (DHS)”. The proposed list of chemicals and their Screening Threshold Quantities (STQ) can be found in the standard’s Appendix A (6 CFR Part 27). The STQ is defined as “the quantity of a chemical of interest, upon which the facility’s obligation to complete and submit the CSAT Top-Screen is based”.
DHS has developed the Chemical Security Assessment Tool (CSAT) to assist in identifying facilities that meet DHS’s criteria for high-risk chemical facilities. It also provides the methodologies these facilities need to conduct Site Vulnerability Assessments (SVA) and to create Site Security Plans (SSP). CSAT is a secure web-based system that provides the following tools:
· Facility Registration · Top-Screen questionnaire · Site Vulnerability Assessment tool · Site Security Plan template
Facilities can register with CSAT at www.dhs.gov/chemicalsecurity and can find other useful information there as well. As of August 10, 2007 the list of chemicals and their Screening Threshold Quantities (Appendix A) had not been finalized or released.
Click on the link below and enter user username and password provided to you!
CONTACT US |
||||||||||||||||